Locul din spatele case unde se adună prieteni la o poveste.

Fediverse

Postări de la conturile urmărite

Hylke Bons 🥜 @hbons@mastodon.social
RE: https://mastodon.com.pl/@tragivictoria/116997594169215204

as a social experiment someone should fork GNOME OS and automerge every vibed PR. then release a monthly .iso for people to use.

see how it works out. 🙃
Vezi original ↗
@drwhax the problem is this works better for certain tasks (finding vulnerabilities) and much worse for other tasks (vibe-coding) because of the shape of these tasks.

"Human in the loop" is not the get-out-of-LLM-problems-free card people try to pretend it is.

Human in the loop works for vulnerability findings because there is a reliable way of verifying the finding. It clearly does not work well for vibe-coding at all because there is no such reliable way of verifying code correctness.
Vezi original ↗
@drwhax and just to drop some data on vibe-coded software quality:
https://www.faros.ai/blog/ai-acceleration-whiplash-takeaways

The report tries to be very "AI"-positive. But the numbers don't lie: +861% code churn, +242% incidents per PR, +54% bugs per developer.
Vezi original ↗
@drwhax and in the end this will come down to managing limited resources and incentives, as always.

If a company can spend $1m in tokens on their codebase, are they incentivized to spend it on finding vulnerabilities, or churning out new vibe-coded features? I know what my guess is.
Vezi original ↗
@drwhax finding vulnerabilities can be stochastic because it has a very clear and effective verification function: either the exploit works or it does not. Exploit code can be messy and convoluted, as it is not going to be maintained after the vulnerability is fixed.

Vibe-coding fixes does not have that kind of verification function: the fix must not only close the specific vulnerability, but *also* not introduce new ones or re-introduce old ones, and it has to be maintainable in the future.
Vezi original ↗
@drwhax I think we need a bit of nuance here.

As much as I am no fan of LLMs, I can see the value of running them over one's own codebase in order to find vulnerabilities.

But I remain unconvinced that vibe-coded fixes are a good idea, or ever will be. I think this needs to be clearly said.

The reason is that these are fundamentally different problems.
Vezi original ↗
Kev Quirk @kev@fosstodon.org
@DekOfTheYautja I don't think my bike has an alienator 🤣

The alternator is fine. I knew the battery was low when I turned it over this morning, but I thought it had enough to kick it to life again. The level crossing was down, so I turned the bike off and it wouldn't kick. Jumper pack sorted it and I took the long way home - bike would then kick over when I got back.

So just me not looking after the battery.
Vezi original ↗
Tuta @Tutanota@mastodon.social
Securing your business communications starts with Tuta.

🛡️ Quantum-proof end-to-end encryption 
🛡️ GDPR compliance 
🛡️ Open source 
🛡️ Full data control & ownership 

ZERO TIES TO BIG TECH

Find out which plan is best for your organization today: https://tuta.com/blog/how-to-choose-tuta-mail-plan-for-business 
Vezi original ↗
European Commission @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu
A small mark, with big power.

For more than 30 years, the CE (Conformité Européenne) marking has allowed many products to be moved and marketed freely all around the EU, regardless of where it’s manufactured.

With this marking, the producer declares that the item meets high EU safety, health, and environmental standards.

You’ll find this mandatory mark across specific product categories, including electronics, toys, and medical devices.

Know what you are buying: https://link.europa.eu/c6nyHc
Vezi original ↗

Comenzi rapide de la tastatură

j
Derulează în jos
k
Derulează în sus
d
Derulează jumătate de pagină în jos
u
Derulează jumătate de pagină în sus
gg
Mergi sus de tot
G
Mergi jos de tot
/
Focalizează căutarea
r
Articol aleatoriu
[
Pagina anterioară
]
Ultima pagină
?
Afișează acest ajutor