> Prosecutors later charged Tunick under a federal statute that makes it unlawful to knowingly destroy or damage property to prevent authorities from seizing it.
They *did* successfully seize the phone (the physical device) though 🤔
Notoriously (in privacy-related cases) you don't have property rights over your data, it's not a commodity. If the government can claim this is property, can I now sue data brokers for stealing/possessing my property?
@ohyran He lives in Iran (hence the crypto). So not only is he doing the work but he's also has to deal with military operations. I think back in April he said some missile had hit some area a few neighborhoods over.
Just so you know how much JustPerfection does for GNOME Extensions, he gets approximately 40-45 extension review requests a day. I don't know how he has the time but he's become very efficient at it.
If you're an extension developers and you have a crypto account - please send a little to JP. If you care about GNOME extensions, he's a one man army.
Übrigens. Wenn ein Tatverdächtiger stirbt, werden die Ermittlungen gegen ihn/ihr eingestellt. Das hilft dann manchmal auch unangenehme Fragen gar nicht erst beantworten zu müssen. Oops. (Rechtsgrundlage: §204, §206a StPO)
@alatiera I’d be shocked if Debian figures out something any time soon; the GR is likely not going to end up with a ban, given the amount of libertarian maximalists in the project, so I fully expect it to end up with “none of the above” winning—if it even gets to a vote