@zoeyTheWitch @alatiera we can always carve out exceptions for specific projects, if they want to have their own policy *and* all the main contributors agree; of course, that comes at a cost in terms of drive-by contributors within the project itself.
As for enforcement: it's a social problem, so it'll have a social impact/solution.
KO się cieszy na rozpad PiSu, a jak nie liczyć oznacza on brązową większość w Sejmie:
https://wiadomosci.wp.pl/pierwszy-sondaz-po-rozlamie-dwa-warianty-nowego-sejmu-tak-wskazali-polacy-7311919621544320a
To nam wyhodowały dekady duopolu Kaczyński-Tusk. Obu panom gratulujemy, historia ich oceni.
Pytanie do publiczności: do dnia wyborów parlamentarnych Roman Giertych…
How we structure school calendars varies across our union, reflecting different local traditions and lifestyle models.
Italian students enjoy nearly 14 full weeks of summer bliss. Over in Denmark, summer is a breezy 6 weeks, balanced with clever mini holidays throughout the school year.
If you were back in school, which one would you prefer? 👇
A couple of weeks ago, I ran into a discussion in Mastodon about whether seeking growth for your projects is a good move or "a wacky, fediverse-only take".
I think it's a perfectly valid strategy for open source, hobby or commercial projects. Not everything needs to seek growth: often the right thing to do is to build things to serve a small group of users — even if that is just one person.
